Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Robert Mecklenburg MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16178.36566.869000.847114@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:39:34 -0600 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug in make? In-Reply-To: <20030806184100.GA16284@redhat.com> References: <20030806184100 DOT GA16284 AT redhat DOT com> IP> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:27:02PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: IP> This could well be a bug in make. I'll take a look at the make source IP> later to see whether there's something obvious. CF> You might want to hop over to the gnu web site and check out the make CF> mailing list to see if this is a known problem. I looked at the bug tracking list on savannah and didn't see any open bugs relating to this issue. I just tried searching bug-make AT gnu DOT org but didn't find anything relevant. There were a lot of (old) posts about an unrelated echo suppression bug in define/endef sequences in 3.79 which made it difficult to be sure. I didn't send the message to bug-make because a) the identical makefile behaves as expected on our local GNU/Linux box (with make 3.80) and b) I had the vague impression that cygwin make was modified enough that Paul Smith (make maintainer) would just bounce it back here. I'll post the original bug report to make-w32 and see what they say. Thanks, -- Robert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/