Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 12:14:21 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-idd AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.1 libc.a link problem
Message-ID: <20030806161421.GA13224@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030805190957 DOT GA2180 AT tishler DOT net> <20030805202015 DOT GA7981 AT redhat DOT com> <20030806035851 DOT GA3943 AT redhat DOT com> <20030806091015 DOT GD15632 AT linux_rln DOT harvest>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030806091015.GD15632@linux_rln.harvest>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:10:15AM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:58:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:20:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:09:57PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> >>While attempting to rebuild procmail against Cygwin 1.5.1, I believe I
>> >>have found a problem with libc.a that interferes with building 64-bit
>> >>apps.
>> >>
>> >>If one builds the attached test program without -lc, we get the
>> >>following:
>> >>
>> >>    $ gcc -o stat stat.c
>> >>    $ objdump -p stat.exe | fgrep stat
>> >>            6100      510  _stat64
>> >>
>> >>But, if one builds it with -lc, we get the following:
>> >>
>> >>    $ gcc -o stat stat.c -lc
>> >>    $ objdump -p stat.exe | fgrep stat
>> >>            6130      945  stat
>> >
>> >Ok.  Interesting.  I know what the problem is.  Should be "easy" to fix.
>> >
>> >Sounds like we need a 1.5.2.
>> 
>> Oh yeah.  That was wicked easy.
>> 
>> Can someone confirm or deny that the latest snapshot solves this
>> problem?
>Unless I did something wrong, I guess I'll have to deny it..
>I installed the complete snapshot (cygwin-inst) and get the same
>results as before.

I assume that you must not have correctly replaced your copy of
/lib/libc.a:

  % ls -l libc.a
  ls -l libc.a
  -rwxrwxrwx    1 root     cgf        741756 Aug  5 23:29 libc.a
  % sum libc.a
  31407   725

cgf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/