Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <600B91D5E4B8D211A58C00902724252C01BC02BB@piramida.hermes.si>
From: David Balazic <david DOT balazic AT hermes DOT si>
To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Less fails with link error
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:07:32 +0200 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hermes.si



> ----------
> From: 	Ronald Landheer-Cieslak[SM]
> Reply To: 	cygwin AT cyg
> Sent: 	6. avgust 2003 18:15
> To: 	David Balazic
> Cc: 	cygwin AT cygwin
> Subject: 	Re: Less fails with link error
> 
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:45:23PM +0200, David Balazic wrote:
> > I just selected the latest version of less ( by clicking on its name to
> > cycle versions ).
> > There was no warning that it is incompatible with the cygwin version.
> Cycling through the versions is a dangerous thing these days - you should
> only
> 
Is there any other way to get from some version selection back to "Skip" ?
If it is dangerous, then it should be disabled or accompanied with a
warning.

> do it if you know what you're doing. The version Setup proposes is the one
> you
> should normally use, because it's the one the maintainer wants you to use.
> The
> maintainer is usually right about what you should use..
There was no note saying that the maintainer prefers one version over
another.
They all were offered to choose from.

> > > You used Setup to install, didn't you?
> > yes.
> > > Use cygcheck to get the version of less, then :)
> > I llearned something new.
> > rpm would catch the incompatibility though :-)
> versioned dependencies in Setup are a work-in-progress *and* require the 
> maintainers to put them in the setup.hint files. Neither is magic.
> 
> IIRC, rpm doesn't use any wizzardry either: versioned dependencies are the
> maintainer's job.
> 
> As for the state of progress on versioned dependencies in Setup (before
> you 
> ask) IIRC it needs testing more than anything else - but one of the Setup
> people will surely correct me if I'm wrong..
> 
Well I guess I just tested it :-)


> rlc
> 
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/