Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3F30169A.6010704@pusspaws.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 21:42:02 +0100
From: David Selby <cygwin AT pusspaws DOT net>
Reply-To: cygwin AT pusspaws DOT net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Yes but I don't understand ...
References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20030805124611 DOT 0204abd0 AT pop DOT sonic DOT net> <5 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20030805124611 DOT 0204abd0 AT pop DOT sonic DOT net> <5 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20030805133157 DOT 01e94190 AT pop DOT sonic DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030805133157.01e94190@pop.sonic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Randall R Schulz wrote:

> David,
>
> At 13:14 2003-08-05, David Selby wrote:
>
>> You are dead right, I tried
>>
>> /bin/bash <script>
>>
>> and it worked perfectly, but I am afraid I do not understand why ...
>> echo $BASH_VERSION
>> Tells me I have bash
>>
>> I call cygwin with ...
>> c:\cygwin\win\rxvt.exe -e \bin\bash --login -i
>> ie bash
>>
>> Where did ash (a stripped down bash?) come in ?
>
>
> As I understand it, it all goes back to the big bang...
>
>
> I don't understand the question. Cygwin has for a long time used ash 
> as it's /bin/sh. Ash is a POSIX compliant shell and is much 
> lighter-weight than BASH. For purposes such as interpreting commands 
> issuing from makefiles, it's faster start-up time makes it a better 
> choice.
>
> You script assumed BASH--that is, it used BASH-specific features. Thus 
> it should explicitly invoke bash in its #! line. The fact that most 
> Linuxes use BASH as their /bin/sh probably falsely led you to believe 
> that BASH was _the_ shell in POSIX-compliant systems. That's not true. 
> In fact, for a long time, even /bin/bash was a version 1.2 BASH, and 
> that was a far cry from what we now know as BASH.
>
>
I see the light
Dave


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/