Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3F2F4896.7030407@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:03:02 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.5.x goes current on 2003-08-23? References: <20030802152342 DOT GA17734 AT redhat DOT com> <801335991093 DOT 20030802235956 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3F2D3E4E DOT 7020508 AT netscape DOT net> <1071417173257 DOT 20030803223258 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3F2EF2B6 DOT 2000205 AT netscape DOT net> In-Reply-To: <3F2EF2B6.2000205@netscape.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Perl is required for many operations, and (as I'm sure Chuck will agree) > having to rebase a *critical* core application *just* to get it work is > unacceptable. Hey, don't drag me into this. Rebase is (currently) a necessary evil for python and maybe perl, but I gave up maintaining perl a LONG time ago and I don't intend to stick my nose into it now. It's Gerritt's baby, and I trust him to do whatever is necessary to make stuff work. But, he's asked for help -- so help, dammit, don't carp. There's no reason that one can't continue using the current perl 5.8.0-1 for a while after 1.5.1 goes gold. (Perl won't be able to manipulate big files or big uid's -- but it can't handle 'em now, so what's the diff?) I reckon Gerritt will keep perl in 'test' mode until he's happy with it, and not switch it over to 'current' a moment earlier. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/