Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3F2CB9AB.6030405@pusspaws.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 08:28:43 +0100
From: David Selby <cygwin AT pusspaws DOT net>
Reply-To: cygwin AT pusspaws DOT net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: vim speed issue
References: <3F2B6994 DOT 7000302 AT pusspaws DOT net> <3F2BFB61 DOT 9090609 AT cygwin DOT com> <3F2C00C7 DOT 7060703 AT pusspaws DOT net> <3F2C0377 DOT 4080609 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3F2C0377.4080609@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Larry Hall wrote:

> David Selby wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Larry Hall wrote:
>>
>>> David Selby wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> OK newbe cygwin user here, have read manual + faq ... so not just 
>>>> lept in with a question !
>>>>
>>>> I have a 700MHz PIII 256MB, I have installed cygwin on 98SE.
>>>> When running it can seem a little slow, ie "man man" takes 2-3 
>>>> seconds, vim screen ripples as I scroll up.
>>>>
>>>> In the FAQ it states that upgrades can have speed problems, This is 
>>>> a new install.
>>>>
>>>> Is it a case of cygwin is just another process as far as 98SE is 
>>>> concerned & so only gets a slice of CPU time ? In which case AOK, 
>>>> no probs I can live with it. Or is there something I need to tweak ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, cygwin proggies are just other processes, just like Windows
>>> proggies. Don't know why knowing that would make you feel better
>>> about the perceived performance problem. But there you are. :-)
>>>
>>> I'd suggest reviewing the text at <http://cygwin.com/problems.html>.
>>>
>>> Win 9x/Me console output is slow and inefficient, though I think what
>>> you describe is extreme (don't know for sure since I don't use 9x/Me).
>>> It may be a configuration issue. One way to narrow things down would be
>>> to try rxvt instead of the console Window. Many on Win9x/Me use this to
>>> avoid the console shortcomings. Some use it on NT/W2K/XP too. ;-) See:
>>>
>>> Is there a better alternative to the standard console window?
>>> <http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_toc.html#TOC66> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks for getting back to me. I was unsure if it was a config 
>> problem just for me or a general thing. My guess is it cant realy be 
>> that slow, how would it run X ? (If this is a dumb statement bourne 
>> of ignorance of cygwin, forgive me!)
>>
>> Anyhow I will try your suggestion and try rxvt,
>> Thanks once again
>> Dave
>
>
>
> Right. vim works great here on the console, but I'm running W2K.


OK tried rxvt, it solved my problem. I guess 98SEs terminal program is 
as inefficient as you said.
A slight delay for the program to execute - then lovely smooth scrolling 
very readable screens

My system is very usable now :-)

I loaded the x-server ... and it seems to boot quite quickly ... Having 
problems calling window managers but will do more research before I call 
for help ...!

Cheers
Dave





--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/