Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Shankar Unni <shankar AT cotagesoft DOT com>
Subject: Re: Problem call a cygwin command from a dos batch file
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:00:59 -0700
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <bg914i$v5j$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <03C99898510C8C47945B932907D99AAA16EC56 AT E2KMEMMCS1 DOT ftbco DOT ftn DOT com> <006a01c3561c$b44f1320$9901020a AT api360 DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (Compact)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <006a01c3561c$b44f1320$9901020a@api360.net>

Lisbeth Kellogg wrote:
> Yes.  Now I get the same thing.  But why don't I have to do it that way
> in XP?

It's nothing to do with the OS or Bill Gates' conspiracies.

Consider the two *machines* as distinct entities, and examine their
configurations (all environment variables, all .rc scripts) to see
what's different between the two.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/