Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3F26FA66.F08C0146@wapme-systems.de> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:51:18 +0200 From: Stipe Tolj Organization: Wapme Systems AG X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew DeFaria CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: apache problems gone with 1.50 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows -> > Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site > over to a Linux box instead - which makes this all kinda moot. However I > do have a friend who wishes to host his web site on a Windows box and I > am contemplating using Cygwin for most services. If Apache under Cygwin > works well with 1.5.0 then perhaps I'll just go that way. I wonder if > anybody has measured the speed difference between Apache for Windows and > Apache under Cygwin... I did some time ago. It was almost 35-40% slower on Apache for Cygwin then his native (win32) counterpart. Plain html file requests, no php or any other "magic". Stipe tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: info AT wapme-systems DOT de Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/