Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject: Re: apache problems gone with 1.50
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:50:28 -0700
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <bg6tnd$q5i$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <NDBBLLFMLFMANIDPNADCMEJNFCAA DOT wpmccormick AT covad DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh
In-Reply-To: <NDBBLLFMLFMANIDPNADCMEJNFCAA.wpmccormick@covad.net>

Bill McCormick wrote:

> I installed cygwin 1.50 and my apache problems have ceased.

This is good to hear. Perhaps I will switch from Apache for Windows -> 
Apache under Cygwin. Only problem is I also trying to move my web site 
over to a Linux box instead - which makes this all kinda moot. However I 
do have a friend who wishes to host his web site on a Windows box and I 
am contemplating using Cygwin for most services. If Apache under Cygwin 
works well with 1.5.0 then perhaps I'll just go that way. I wonder if 
anybody has measured the speed difference between Apache for Windows and 
Apache under Cygwin...



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/