Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030723150051.02052750@pop.sonic.net> X-Sender: rschulz AT pop DOT sonic DOT net Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:03:56 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: RE: Skipping the /proc filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 13:59 2003-07-23, Chris January wrote: > > Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > At 18:15 2003-07-22, David A. Cobb wrote: > > >>I would wish to tell find not to get involved with the /proc filesystem > > >>at all. Can that easily be done? > > > > > > Very easily: > > > % find / -path '/proc' -prune -o -print > > > > Would it make sense to identify the inodes under /proc/registry as not > > regular files (type f), but, say, devices (or other such special files)? > >No. Chris, Just to clarify what may, due to quote trimming, appear to be a suggestion I made, the idea about using a special inode type for the /proc entries was not mine, it was David A. Cobb's. Randall Schulz -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/