Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZNdRdmAvNf0LpEYucr4BErjasedHTI+ozefCiNDOGIgLFUri5WNQEx Message-ID: <3F1F04D8.6030702@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:57:44 -0400 From: Larry Hall Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Anderson CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Timothy C Prince Subject: Re: How to diagnose Cygwin / Windows shutdown problem References: <1058981234 DOT c86164c0tprince AT myrealbox DOT com> <006a01c35145$3e0dc930$19c3fea9 AT RAnderson> <3F1ED6EC DOT 6040100 AT cygwin DOT com> <014801c35162$1146e6d0$19c3fea9 AT RAnderson> In-Reply-To: <014801c35162$1146e6d0$19c3fea9@RAnderson> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard Anderson wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry Hall" > To: "Richard Anderson" > Cc: "Timothy C Prince" ; > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:41 AM > Subject: Re: How to diagnose Cygwin / Windows shutdown problem > > > >>Richard Anderson wrote: >> >> >>>So this is a know issue? Seems like non-standard behavior for a Windows > > app. > >>>All Windows apps that I know of catch the shutdown interrupt, clean up > > their > >>>data structures and exit gracefully. Is there some reason why Cygwin > > can't > >>>do this? >> >>Let's turn the question around. Are you interested in implementing and >>submitting a patch to do this? I'm sure folks here would be willing to >>discuss the viability of such functionality in the context of a patch >>to implement it. >> > > Timothy, your response might be interpreted as an attempt to discourage the > user community from reporting problems or questioning apparent design flaws. > I would think that a discussion group like this is the proper forum for > submitting comments like my original e-mail. Any open-source software > project that doesn't encourage comments from the user community is cutting > itself off from a valuable source of feedback. You quoted my response but attributed it to Timothy I believe. In that context, I will respond. Please don't misinterpret my response. I'm suggesting if this is of interest to you, you should pursue it. That's the best way to get functionality you want in Cygwin. As a frame of reference, this is not the first time this observation has been made on this list. You can check the email archives for relevant discussions of this topic if you're interested in more details of the history. This list operates on various levels when it comes to feedback. Comments abound. They are always noted even if they don't really strike anyone's fancy beyond the original poster (mind you, I'm not implying anything here). Comments from those motivated and capable of contributing solutions along with their comments are valued even more. Like all volunteer efforts, ideas are plenty while resources are few. So we like to suggest patches accompany problem reports wherever possible. That's all. Essentially, I'm not trying to say anything more than the first few paragraphs of . Perhaps I should have just responded with the URL in the first place and let it go at that. ;-) If you're interested and can do so, I encourage you to follow up on this area of functionality. If you're not, thanks for the report. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/