Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: Skipping the /proc filesystem Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:41:57 -0700 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <3F1DE1B2 DOT 8080406 AT cox DOT net> <5 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20030722183014 DOT 01eeb838 AT pop DOT sonic DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (Compact) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030722183014.01eeb838@pop.sonic.net> Randall R Schulz wrote: > At 18:15 2003-07-22, David A. Cobb wrote: >>I would wish to tell find not to get involved with the /proc filesystem >>at all. Can that easily be done? > > Very easily: > % find / -path '/proc' -prune -o -print Would it make sense to identify the inodes under /proc/registry as not regular files (type f), but, say, devices (or other such special files)? -- Shankar. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/