Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030722194744.03ac0e38@pop.sonic.net> X-Sender: rschulz AT pop DOT sonic DOT net Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 19:56:02 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: How to resolve a link? In-Reply-To: <20030723012957.GC3329@redhat.com> References: <3F1DE381 DOT 7010605 AT cox DOT net> <3F1DE381 DOT 7010605 AT cox DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Chris, At 18:29 2003-07-22, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:23:13PM -0400, David A. Cobb wrote: > >Recently, I was trying to do "strace Xemacs . . ." > >First I got a "No such file" error, so I changed to do "strace `which > >xemacs` " -- still a failure. > > > >which xemacs returns "/usr/local/bin/xemacs.exe.lnk"; that is, my normal > >handle to launch xemacs is a symlink to the executable whose name or > >location varies with the version-number. > > > >Given that its purpose is to locate what executable file one will use in > >a particular environment, should not 'which' resolve the symlink and > >return its target? > >No. > > >What would happen on *nix? > >The same thing as on cygwin. Really? Since Cygwin "strace" is not a Cygwin program, it does not get Cygwin symbolic links resolved. Whereas on Unix or Linux, a symlink would be resolved by the kernel if it was used by strace and it (strace) would successfully get its target executed. So wouldn't the behavior on Cygwin differ from a comparable invocation on Linux or Unix? Randall Schulz -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/