Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Henry Da Costa" To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:32:11 -0400 Message-ID: <200D3BAC3B6A8E478CC72B132478BEDC04ACFA@astromd.immersion.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2003 22:32:13.0471 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE8432F0:01C34FD7] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h6LMVwH21932 Larry Hall wrote: > Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of > this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly > speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from > Red Hat, they are legally bound by the GPL. If they aren't providing > source for all parts of the Cygwin distribution they're using, as well as > source for their executable, they are in violation of the GPL. If this is > the case, this list would like to know about this violation so it can be > resolved. Can you enlighten us on this aspect? I'm trying to get what I need from the provider of that executable. The executable only calls Cygwin executables, much like a perl or shell script. It doesn't incorporate any Cygwin or Gnu code. Thanks for your help. Henry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/