Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: Spammers watching this user forum Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 16:12:47 -0700 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <3F17DD1F DOT 3010409 AT yahoo DOT com> <3F1868A8 DOT 40803 AT jhuapl DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh In-Reply-To: <3F1868A8.40803@jhuapl.edu> Steve Coleman wrote: > My current thoughts.. Most spammers use open relays as their way to > move their email into the legitimate Internet email system Are you sure about this? I know spammers abuse open relays but I'm not as certain that the majority of their spamming occurs over open relays. > If enough machines on the internet listened on port 25 out there and > "ate" all the spammers junk like this then the spammers would have a > tough time staying in business by trying to use open relays, because > they would never know if their cruft was /dev/null'ed or not. You probably will have as much luck convincing people who have open relays (either on purpose or by accident) to configure a "spam eater" as you would just having them close their open relay! As such this plan would probably never work. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/