Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 22:19:27 +0100 From: Elfyn McBratney X-X-Sender: elfyn AT ellixia Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Julian Gardner cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Installing Cygwin Under W2k In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Julian Gardner wrote: > Tried a couple of things on the two machines (thanks to Andrew Markebo) > > ls -l /bin/sh > > ----------+ 1 ???????? Domain U 69632 Jul 31 2002 /bin/sh (non working) > > -rwxrwxrwx 1 Administ Users 69632 Jul 31 2002 /bin/sh (working) Certainly. A binary without execute permissions will not be able to be executed. So chmod -R a+rx /bin should help. But the '????????' username part of ls doesn't look to healthy... Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB | http://www.nongnu.org/wwwauth/ http://www.emcb.co.uk | http://www.emcb.co.uk/webauth/ elfyn AT emcb DOT co DOT uk | wwwauth-users AT nongnu DOT org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/