Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZq5sDWMwcQuAZ6yL3GAh6qLd3rz6lqrBUVIjDStanl+/rVv5yGwgLr Message-ID: <3F16AF4B.7060003@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:14:35 -0400 From: Larry Hall Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Rozenboim CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.0 managed mode & backward compatibility References: <6A3008858445D711A58A00062939B2F1EB0A AT EXCHANGE> In-Reply-To: <6A3008858445D711A58A00062939B2F1EB0A@EXCHANGE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pavel Rozenboim wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf-idd AT cygwin DOT com] >>Sent: Wed, July 16, 2003 6:07 PM >>To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>Subject: Re: cygwin 1.5.0 managed mode & backward compatibility >> >> >>On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:48:28PM +0200, Pavel Rozenboim wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I installed cygwin 1.5.0 and remounted all cygwin >> >>directories (/,/usr/bin, >> >>>/usr/lib) in managed mode. Now I can't access files that >> >>have a capital >> >>>letters that were created before upgrade to 1.5.0. >> >>*exactly* >> >>Don't do that. Do not use managed mode on your old >>directories. It is >>called "managed" for a reason. Cygwin wants to manage all >>file creations. >>So, the only way to use it is to create an empty directory, mount it >>as managed, and then populate it with files. > > > Do you have any plans to provide backward/windows compatibility for managed > mode? Perhaps I'm being simplistic but I can't see how Windows compatibility could be added in terms of it displaying the unmanaged names and understanding which name maps where. I assume that's what you meant. If not, please clarify. Also, I'm not sure I understand the implication of 'backward' in your statement, unless it was just a qualifier for 'windows'. There's no reason that Windows applications can't work with the managed named files of course. At least, no reason AFAICS. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/