Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Ideas re problem reporting From: Robert Collins To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20030716054307.GC3817@redhat.com> References: <20030716002142 DOT E1F2434381 AT nevin DOT research DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <20030716033302 DOT GA6050 AT redhat DOT com> <1058333460 DOT 3403 DOT 303 DOT camel AT localhost> <20030716054307 DOT GC3817 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-rYQzL84tIRQsGS+h4vqJ" Message-Id: <1058335328.3403.341.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 16 Jul 2003 16:02:08 +1000 --=-rYQzL84tIRQsGS+h4vqJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 15:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:31:00PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 13:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >> cygcheck -rsv (or cygcheck -c) already implies this. If the output > >> from cycheck doesn't include package information, then the packages > >> weren't installed via setup.exe. > > > >I've seen at least one script that (badly) reverse engineered setup's db > >files and attempts to create compatible ones. >=20 > Really? Where was this? We should certainly be on the lookout for > this. >=20 http://cygnome.sourceforge.net/install.html installpkg.sh. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-rYQzL84tIRQsGS+h4vqJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/FOpgI5+kQ8LJcoIRApI/AJ9Azc7HvAdoQqk9ScowJdc4uJFThQCeJU50 Hlq/taMjjPsZ0OYsNqHNOZo= =pbDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rYQzL84tIRQsGS+h4vqJ--