Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:13:03 +1000 (EST) From: luke DOT kendall AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au Subject: Binaries via Line or by rebuilding? To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20030716001303.C7C6734381@nevin.research.canon.com.au> On 25 Mar, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Re: cant run binaries in cygwin > Unless you mean "there's no binary but the Linux binary", in which case > Cygwin will probably not be of much use to you, but you might be > interested in something like Line (). It looks like development of Line stopped in 2001, at an alpha version. Was that because it's more normal for people to simply port a program by building from source under Cygwin? luke -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/