Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:51:16 +0100 From: Elfyn McBratney <elfyn AT emcb DOT co DOT uk> X-X-Sender: elfyn AT ellixia Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com> cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: development under 1.5.0 ?s In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.56.0307101535150.1846@eos> Message-ID: <Pine.CYG.4.55.0307102148520.1464@ellixia> References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0307101628390 DOT 6088-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0307101535150 DOT 1846 AT eos> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Brian Ford wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Brian Ford wrote: > > > > > Yeah, that's what I thought. I was hopping we might have figured out an > > > easy way to do this by now, though. Oh, well. I'll figure it out myself. > > > > > > One reason I ask is that I am the unofficial lesstif maintainer, and I > > > need to figure out when it is safe to build the new lesstif libs. > > > > If you use no other DLLs, you can simply recompile the lesstif DLLs and > > release them in a test package. Otherwise, check the prototypes of the > > functions your DLLs call to see if they contain any of the changed > > datatypes (see Chris's reply), perhaps recursively in structs. If not, > > you can use them. > > > I just checked, and lesstif only depends on the Xlibs. I haven't checked > yet, and don't plan to (that's a huge job!), if any of the Xlib > interfaces use any of the types that changed sizes, however. > > So, being the conscientious package maintainer that I am, do I go ahead and > release a new test lesstif package before the Xlibs have been recompiled, > or do I wait? > > lesstif should come out the same regardless. But depending on > the types used in the Xlib interfaces, my new lesstif test package may be > broken until a new Xlib test package is installed and released. > > Do I have this right? Well first things first, as I think Corinna mentioned, we need to release new library packages. So yes, I guess lesstif applies. Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB http://www.emcb.co.uk elfyn AT emcb DOT co DOT uk -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/