Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:44:51 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: development under 1.5.0 ?s Message-ID: <20030710194451.GA9757@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 02:33:09PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: >Could Corinna, or someone else knowledgeable, help me clear up some >issues with respect to development under 1.5.0? If I should just >wait for the (forth coming?) posting to cygwin-apps, just say so. >Thanks. If you want to use 1.5.0, the safest thing to do is recompile everything with the current headers and libraries. Anything which uses off_t, uid_t, gid_t, blkcnt_t, dev_t, or ino_t is affected. This obviously includes structures such as 'struct stat' which use these types. IMO, this falls into the better safe than sorry rule. Things should work fine with old headers and old libraries. If you want to move to the new system, it is safer to rebuild everything. Obviously, once you move to 1.5.0, you won't be able to go back, but that's not really any different than most cygwin releases. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/