Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:33:07 +0100 (BST)
From: andrew brian clegg <a DOT clegg AT mail DOT cryst DOT bbk DOT ac DOT uk>
X-X-Sender: fcleg01 AT sark DOT cryst DOT bbk DOT ac DOT uk
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Apache mod_ssl fork problem
In-Reply-To: <20030707111009.GA864@tishler.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307071422460.24387-100000@sark.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact CCSG (http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/CCSG/) more information
X-MailScanner-cryst-bbk: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-31.6, required 9,
	BAYES_01, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, IN_REP_TO,
	QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, QUOTE_TWICE_1, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	USER_AGENT_PINE)


On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:11:13AM +0100, andrew brian clegg wrote:

> > Thanks, I'll try it tonight when I get home. Just out of curiosity --
> > I rebased everything in /bin as well as /lib/apache, and cygssl.dll is
> > in /bin -- what does rebaseall do differently that will make it work
> > for cases where rebase didn't?
> 
> See the rebase README:
> 
>     http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/rebase/rebase-2.2.README

That doesn't really answer my question -- the point being that cygssl.dll
is in /bin and I rebased /bin/*.dll without getting any warnings about
dlls being in use.

Not saying that rebaseall won't work (will find out for sure when I'm at 
the console, can't try it over ssh obviously!), just wondering what magic 
will allow rebaseall to work on a dll that's already, apparently, been 
rebased. If the problem was not actually cygssl.dll itself but another 
library outside of /bin and /lib/apache that it depended on, one would 
expect that to show up in the error message rather than cygssl.dll right?

Pardon me if I've missed anything in the readme that explains this 
though...

Cheers,

Andrew.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/