Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Chris January" To: Subject: RE: mmap() and gcc precompiled headers Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 18:59:18 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20030703143010.GV1165@cygbert.vinschen.de> Importance: Normal > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:19:42AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:47:28AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >Do you mean something like this: > > > > > > If addr is given, check if it's 64K aligned. If not, align and > > > raise the memory requirement accordingly. Call MapViewOfFileEx > > > with the aligned address. If it works, return the addr given as > > > parameter, otherwise return MapViewOfFileEx(NULL). > > > > How about, instead, just use the address and if it fails and is not > > MAP_FIXED, use MapViewOfFileEx without the address? > > Yep, that's the simple approach. I dropped this suggestion from my > original reply since it requires addr to be on a 64k boundary. > Unfortunately I have no idea if the chance to succeed might be better > or worse than using the more complex approach. Just out of curiosity would a patch to support mmap on 4k boundaries be useful/accepted? Chris -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/