Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZkpJ18DOPFntyxAKcLUxKj6L6qZvyEUK40CPvHSLj7yWYCdxc84GT4 Message-ID: <3F02E5A9.3060700@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:01:13 -0400 From: Larry Hall Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mark R." CC: "'Gary R. Van Sickle'" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why do symlinks need to be system files References: <200307021242 DOT h62CgfpK019230 AT ares DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU> In-Reply-To: <200307021242.h62CgfpK019230@ares.cs.Virginia.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark R. wrote: > That does make sense. I've played around with using ln -s to create my own > symlinks. The odd thing is that these are all being created as shortcuts vs > this other method. Now that I'm in the "I'm just curious" mode - Does anyone > know why the two different methods are used? > > -Mark One is method is "old" and one is "new". Setup uses the "old" method. See: and look for '(no)winsymlinks'. You too can use the "old" method if you like. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/