Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:51:33 +0100 From: Elfyn McBratney X-X-Sender: elfyn AT ellixia Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: About the 'su' command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Brian, > > That's the reason behind the cygdaemon effort. So "somebody" is doing > it... > Igor In-fact, I'm working on this ATM. And, it's coming along nicely, thank you very much! :-) Elfyn > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 Brian DOT Kelly AT empireblue DOT com wrote: > > > >> Why rewrite 'su' to do those types of tricks, when 'ssh' already exists? > > > > Uhhh - how about "script portability??" > > > > (Which is why I predict su will "someday" be made to do this. When?? > > Simple, > > When somebody does it .... ) [ I ain't demand'in nothin from nobody ] > > > > Brian Kelly > > > > > > "Karsten M. Self" @cygwin.com on 06/29/2003 07:34:57 PM > > Sent by: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com > > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > > cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire) > > Subject: Re: About the 'su' command > > > > Is this, or could this be made, part of the standard Cygwin docs and/or > > FAQ? > > > > Very nice explanation, Bill. > > > > Peace. -- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/