Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:22:02 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To: dwmccowan AT alltel DOT net
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin gcc
Message-ID: <20030620172202.GA8086@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: dwmccowan AT alltel DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030620171520 DOT GZLH6187 DOT mta02-srv DOT alltel DOT net AT mta02-srv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030620171520.GZLH6187.mta02-srv.alltel.net@mta02-srv>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports:  http://cygwin.com/ .

If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the project web page.

For your convenience, I've reset the Reply-To: address to point to the
cygwin mailing list.  I've also Cc'ed this reply there.

See also:  http://cygwin.com/problems.html and pay particular attention
to this section:

Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a cygwin developer or package maintainer?

    Isn't personal email more efficient than using a mailing list?   or
    I don't want to bother the list with my problem.  or
    I'm not really sure if this is a real problem and want to find
     out before I bother the list. 

On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 12:15:20PM -0500, dwmccowan AT alltel DOT net wrote:
>I have an application program one of whose procedures fails
>to compile correctly with gcc at any optimization level.  It
>runs fine but slowly with no optimization.  This routine runs
>optimized on my SUN and on SGI but not under Linux 8 or Cygwin.
>I suspect an error in the optimizer for gcc.
>I downloaded an evaluation copy of pgcc and the routine ran
>fine under optimization.  Is there any way to either use the
>pgcc compiler under Cygwin or link in pgcc compiled objects
>using the Cygwin gcc loader?
>
>Thanks,
>Doug McCowan

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/