Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3EF08A1A.7030208@onevision.de> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:49:46 +0200 From: Roland Schwingel Organization: OneVision Software AG User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: de, de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Testversion uploaded: bash-2.05b-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi... cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com wrote on 18.06.2003 17:34:32: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:18:29PM +0200, Roland Schwingel wrote: > > I also tested this release (of course). I do not use textmode, neither > > scripts > > with DOS line endings but I created one and can verify this as well.. > > > > Nevertheless, I want to mention that the speed gain brought by this > > version is more > > then noticable... I have one which runs normally about 5 Minutes, no in > > less then 1(!) > > If you have the choice between speed and correctness, which one do > you choose? Correctness of course! But maybe the patch should be improved to not show these bad effects. I try to get some time next week and see whether I can understand bash Roland -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/