Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVa+e4YVv842/nzvOChOQ3WRnhWo1+MmW3exmzm+8GKLqMGmakrjhmg+ Message-ID: <3EEFAFC5.1050502@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:18:13 -0400 From: Larry Hall Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sylvain Petreolle CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: About the 'su' command References: <20030617233836 DOT 35651 DOT qmail AT web10103 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20030617233836.35651.qmail@web10103.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > Do you mean here that the only user who can do 'su' at the moment is > SYSTEM ?? > >>Certainly. SYSTEM. But I'd highly recommend using ssh instead of >>su. That way you don't have to create a user with privileges that >>opens a security hole just so you can su. Of course, you can do >>so if you prefer. >> By default, yes. It is the only user that's guaranteed to have the appropriate privileges. There's been discussions about this on this list previously if you'd like to know more. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/