Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Info: This message was accepted for relay by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net as the sender used SMTP authentication X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVan9/xTEw3QX7VAJVb3azqyFuCYebNOe07wwRX829SnSCuEMi4aSSeM Message-ID: <3EEA0F4E.9000805@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 13:52:14 -0400 From: Larry Hall Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: named pipes? References: <3EE9E64A DOT 2070100 AT cygwin DOT com> <20030613173446 DOT GC27564 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <20030613173446.GC27564@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: > >>Chuck wrote: >> >>>Are there any plans to add names pipes to cygwin? >> >>There is no active implementation underway AFAIK. You can check the >>email archives for an overview of the history of the discussion on this >>issue. As always, we like patches. ;-) > > > Actually, I have the beginning of an implementation on a cygwin branch. > It is by no means perfect but I hope to have a working implementation > sometime in the next six months. Cool! I'll ask about it every few days, just to see how things are going. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/