Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-envelope-info: Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030610063654.01ec2e10@pop.sonic.net> X-Sender: rschulz AT pop DOT sonic DOT net Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 06:41:59 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: Vim and the navigating with arrow keys In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Brian, At 06:27 2003-06-10, Brian DOT Kelly AT empireblue DOT com wrote: >"True Vim'ers DO NOT navigate with arrow keys". I remember reading >that somewhere. Certainly the "correct" way to navigate in Vim is with >the H J K and L keys. Understood, acknowledged, yaddy yadda >yaaa. That said - I "like" to use the arrow keys. It's habitual and >something I've been doing for years and years. And like most folks, I >"resist" change. Therefore, I'm a little "disturbed" that the latest >Vim appears to have completely disabled the arrow keys for navigation, >or even for mapping. You are mistaken. Arrow keys are working fine in: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2 (2003 Jun 1, compiled Jun 1 2003 19:49:13) If arrow keys are not functioning for you in Vim, the problem is not Vim itself. >Is this a "planned" and permanent new condition?? The previous >version 6.1-300 still has arrow keys enabled, but 6.2-1 does not - or >so it appears. Now I do note, the navigating appears much more precise >and improved with 6.2-1, no more having to do CTRL-L's to refresh the >screen after navigating small text files. (Which was a bother). I >don't use RXVT, but bash in a cmd shell. What TERM setting are you using? I have always found Vim to be virtually flawless in screen maintenance with TERM=cygwin under the Cygwin console-based terminal emulation. >I'm a minimalist at heart and try to use native and ubiquitous >utilities to the greatest extent possible - which is why I long ago >chose Vi as my primary editor. Because it's "everywhere", especially >in UNIX, I'm never without "my" editor. Anyhow, I'd just to like to >know if anyone else has noticed this, cares, or knows something about >it. I can of course live without arrows, but I'd rather not if I don't have to. We're all deeply caring people here, even if a bit mean. Randall Schulz -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/