Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 19:30:42 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [postmaster AT sources DOT redhat DOT com] This is all very silly... Message-ID: <20030607233042.GB29029@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030607183129 DOT GA26572 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 09:08:07PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: >>From Christopher Faylor > > > >Apart from all the facts on rudeness and such... Yeah, apart from that tiny fact. >If I get this kind of response (rude or not) on something I have >written/published (It has happened ;-P) - then I go wondering if I have >done a bad job communicating relevant stuff. The cygwin web page, FAQ, etc. are not static documents. There is no reason for you to assume that they are. > At times I have found problems e.g. in descriptive text. If you are referring to problems at the cygwin web page, then you always have the option of providing new text. Otherwise, suggesting that you "have found problems" is valueless information on the order of saying "my program doesn't run" when reporting a bug. >- One thing I have learnt; every attempting to keep a humble profile >can help. (irritation and short time-limits in combination makes me >less humble ;-) And, offering unsolicited advice in a public forum is the height of humbleness, eh? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/