Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:13:07 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Sparse file criteria malfunction - binutils produces sparse .exe & .dll files Message-ID: <20030605191307.GA18497@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <006901c32b7f$0d7cceb0$78d96f83 AT pomello> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 12:41:18PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >2) In all other details (including restricted characters in filenames), > Cygwin uses the underlying filesystem's conventions. If we go out of > our way to be compatible with Linux in this aspect, why not also > support "aux" as the filename, or support '\' in filenames? The > argument for not doing the latter was that we don't want to > disassociate ourselves from the underlying filesystem, IIRC, so why go > back on it now? If there was a Windows call which allowed us to easily write, read, rename, and delete special windows names, cygwin would use it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/