Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <BD170DF22DD4D3118E240090278D33EA93F21C@exchange.imtek.com>
From: Ross Presser <rpresser AT Imtek DOT com>
To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Possible problem with ctags
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:34:16 -0400 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

I will now put myself in the corner for one hour for failing to read the
directions. :) Sorry, won't happen again.  At least it is also on the list.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:40 pm
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: Possible problem with ctags
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:03:43PM +0000, Ross Presser wrote:
> >[posted and mailed to Simon Liddington <simon DOT liddington AT tait DOT co DOT nz>]
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> See: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -
> 
>   Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a cygwin 
> developer or package maintainer?
>    
>       Isn't personal email more efficient than using a 
> mailing list?   or
>       I don't want to bother the list with my problem.  or
>       I'm not really sure if this is a real problem and want 
> to find out before I bother the list.
> 
> >Exuberant Ctags 5.5, Copyright (C) 1996-2003 Darren Hiebert
> >  Compiled: Apr 14 2003, 10:16:41
> >  Addresses: <dhiebert AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>,
> >      http://ctags.sourceforge.net
> >  Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex, +internal-sort
> >
> >(By the way, although this version announces itself as 5.5, 
> it is really 
> >5.5.3 according to /setup.exe.)
> 
> According to setup.exe, it's 5.5-3.  The -3 is the cygwin 
> release number which
> is not reflected in the version.
> 
> cgf
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/