Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:39:34 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Possible problem with ctags Message-ID: <20030604163934.GA20441@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <16072 DOT 19047 DOT 756000 DOT 703547 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:03:43PM +0000, Ross Presser wrote: >[posted and mailed to Simon Liddington ] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ See: http://cygwin.com/problems.html - Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a cygwin developer or package maintainer? Isn't personal email more efficient than using a mailing list? or I don't want to bother the list with my problem. or I'm not really sure if this is a real problem and want to find out before I bother the list. >Exuberant Ctags 5.5, Copyright (C) 1996-2003 Darren Hiebert > Compiled: Apr 14 2003, 10:16:41 > Addresses: , > http://ctags.sourceforge.net > Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex, +internal-sort > >(By the way, although this version announces itself as 5.5, it is really >5.5.3 according to /setup.exe.) According to setup.exe, it's 5.5-3. The -3 is the cygwin release number which is not reflected in the version. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/