Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3ED21307.4010101@yahoo.com.cn> Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 21:13:43 +0800 From: Liu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313 X-Accept-Language: zh-cn, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: using syscall in cygwin? References: <20030524123851 DOT 34720 DOT qmail AT web15307 DOT mail DOT bjs DOT yahoo DOT com> <20030524175023 DOT GA6768 AT redhat DOT com> <3ED07063 DOT 5030600 AT yahoo DOT com DOT cn> <20030525083010 DOT GF19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20030525083010.GF19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't understand this well. Thank you anyway. I will study it further. Kai > No. In case of Cygwin the syscall *is* open(). Don't mess with it. > N.B., there's no glibc involved at all. Cygwin doesn't use glibc but > newlib as std C lib. > > Corinna > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/