Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 10:30:10 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: using syscall in cygwin?
Message-ID: <20030525083010.GF19367@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20030524123851 DOT 34720 DOT qmail AT web15307 DOT mail DOT bjs DOT yahoo DOT com> <20030524175023 DOT GA6768 AT redhat DOT com> <3ED07063 DOT 5030600 AT yahoo DOT com DOT cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3ED07063.5030600@yahoo.com.cn>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:27:31PM +0800, Kai Liu wrote:
> Thank you for your response.
> I just want to write code using my own open().
> How can I implement open() without syscall() to make the system call?
> Maybe I need also write my own syscall() which call glibc's open(), and 
> link them staticly?
> Is it reasonable?

No.  In case of Cygwin the syscall *is* open().  Don't mess with it.
N.B., there's no glibc involved at all.  Cygwin doesn't use glibc but
newlib as std C lib.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/