Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)" <garbage_collector AT telia DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Setup.exe sugestion/annoyance
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 15:20:15 +0200
Message-ID: <NGBBLLIAMFLGJEOAJCCEAEPBCPAA.garbage_collector@telia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030521191007.01ba4008@localhost>

> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf
> Of Greg McCrory

> Show of hands please, who actually uses a 640x480 monitor anymore?
>
> GMc

 I have two 200Mhz Pentium Pro machines, they run Win 98 in 800x600 (15"
monitor) and 1024x768 (17" monitor).

 I'd consider 166Mhz to be the lowest usable machine of today (I believe
there is one or two around at school. In the library at least.). Considering
this; wouldn't 800x600 be an apropriate "low end" screen resolution?

/Hannu E K Nevalainen, Mariefred, Sweden, 59?14'N, 17?12'E. >17?C
average/day now.
--END OF MESSAGE--


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/