Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:22:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: David Abrahams cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Strange Cygwin issue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 19 May 2003, David Abrahams wrote: > I thought you might be able to help with this. I'm having a strange > problem invoking the "TLIB" tool (from Borland's free compiler package > http://www.borland.com/products/downloads/download_cbuilder.html) from > Cygwin. > > When you pass paths to this thing, they need to have a particular > form. TLIB seems to want to make everything into an option, so it > interprets forward slashes and dashes as beginning an option, no > matter where they appear... unless they're quoted. Actually, It > always takes forward slashes as option characters, but dashes have to > be (double) quoted. You can download this stuff and try for yourself > if curious. > > Anyway, if I have to pass a path like "c:\foo-bar\baz", it works from > the WinXP command-prompt, but not from the Cygwin command-prompt. The > actual use case has the command being invoked by execvp, but the bash > shell seems to be a fine way to experiment with it. the weird thing > is, I built a little windows app win MSVC to print out all of its > argv, and if I invoke it like this: > > args "c:\foo-bar\baz" > > from either windows or cygwin, I see the same thing: > > c:\foo-bar\baz > > I can't imagine what would make TLIB see something different, except > *perhaps* that it's a DOS program and not a Win32 program... not that > I have any idea how/why that has an effect. > > Can you shed any light on this? > > Many thanks in advance, > Dave Dave, Have you tried compiling a small DOS program with bcc and seeing what it would interpret its parameters as? It might be helpful if it printed one argument per line, or somehow indicated where the break in the arguments happens. Also, IIRC from my DOS hacking days, assembly programs received the whole parameter string at once, and had to parse it themselves, so it's possible that you have found a bug in TLIB's argument parsing routine. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/