Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:57:08 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /proc/meminfo - swap question Message-ID: <20030515115708.GQ19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030515104428 DOT GN19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:06:04PM +0400, Roman Belenov wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 06:03:52PM -0700, linda w (cyg) wrote: > >> /proc/meminfo reports: > >> > total: used: free: > >> > Mem: 536305664 339480576 196825088 > >> > Swap: 1043218432 283000832 760217600 > >> > Thing is, my swapfile is 512M (physmem=512M). So instead > >> > of 'swap' and 'mem', shouldn't those fields be labeled virtual and > >> > physical memory? > > > > These are the same names used by Linux /proc/meminfo. > > But the meaning is different; IMHO the values should fixed to be > Linux-compatible. Done in CVS. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/