Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:44:28 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: /proc/meminfo - swap question Message-ID: <20030515104428.GN19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000001c31a7d$db6bdfe0$1403a8c0 AT sc DOT tlinx DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000001c31a7d$db6bdfe0$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 06:03:52PM -0700, linda w (cyg) wrote: > /proc/meminfo reports: > > total: used: free: > > Mem: 536305664 339480576 196825088 > > Swap: 1043218432 283000832 760217600 > > Thing is, my swapfile is 512M (physmem=512M). So instead > > of 'swap' and 'mem', shouldn't those fields be labeled virtual and > > physical memory? These are the same names used by Linux /proc/meminfo. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/