Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 23:19:00 +0100
From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Nuisance problem with XP file permissions
Message-ID: <20030513221900.GE15258@ganymede>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <201701c3146d$109b7480$6401a8c0 AT SARS>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201701c3146d$109b7480$6401a8c0@SARS>
X-Debian-GNU-Linux: Rocks
X-Kuro5hin-cabal: There is no K5 cabal
X-GPG-Fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595  DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0
X-uptime: 05:20:50 up 185 days, 20:46, 15 users,  load average: 0.03, 0.15, 0.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

on Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:48:27AM -0700, Mike (mike2 AT myhome DOT net) wrote:
> I?ve been testing some new stuff where I?ve got apps/scripts creating new
> files and directories and I?ve hit a snag with Windows XP and file
> permissions. Its probably an easy answer but I?m at a loss with my
> experience level with cygwin.
> ?
> First off, in running Windows XP, I am forced to log in as a user (who has
> Administrator rights) and cannot login as user ?Administrator? as I would on
> a Win2k box. So, when I installed cygwin, the entire distribution seems to
> be owned by me and seemed to have a file permission mask of 0007 ? that is,
> all files have --- for ?other? permission bits r-xr-x--- or rw-rw----. This
> didn?t initially cause any problems until I started working on a new project
> ? specifically, playing around with the new RPM package testing going on in
> cygwin-apps. Nevertheless, the first question is ? should the permissions be
> something different or is this ?normal?? I did a rather drastic step to
> avoid annoying permissions problems and recursively gave world permissions
> to the entire distribution ? yeah, I cringed too, but its not a public or
> even private server, just a convenience tool box.
> ?
> So far, no big deal? until I start working with tar files that already have
> permissions set that would prevent the non-root user from modifying them.
> Specifically, a configure file that untar?d with r?r?r? permissions.
> Somewhere in the install process of this tar package something (a higher
> level configure or Makefile) calls autoconf/automake/autotool (one of these
> ? not important which) to rebuild the configure file. However, with these
> permissions and my aforementioned user permissions, I continually get a
> ?cannot create configure: permission denied?.
> ?
> This too isn?t a big deal, I can chmod the file and re-run that specific
> configure/makefile and everything is fine. But it strikes me that this
> shouldn?t be. If I, the user logged in, have permission to modify a file,
> chmod it, chown it, delete it, whatever, why shouldn?t the scripts I run be
> able to do the same?

XP Pro or XP Home?

Do you have "simple file sharing" selected under Windows Explorer?  If
so, *deselect* it.  This borks up file permissions with both Windows
*and* Cygwin, IIRC.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
   Geek for hire:  http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/