Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 13:40:06 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: redistribution cygwin1.dll Message-ID: <20030513174006.GC19209@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:07:45PM -0400, Jim Drash wrote: >No I am not thinking trademark. Copyright law is based upon contract law. >So there is legal "detriment" on both sides. Failure to enforce >provisions of a contact can make that contract voidible . > >I am very tied of this debate. The simple thing is to follow the details >of the GPL (or whatever licenses applies) regardless of how "silly" >anyone thinks it is. > >It is just so trivial for developers to comply and debates as to why one >should not have to comply merely waste everyone's time and seem to make >cgf more mean That's for sure. And the obvious interpretation is that if I'm becoming more mean, I must really be enjoying this, right? Anyway, thank you for your interpretation. Of course, you're not a lawyer (I assume) so now we can play that game if we wanted to prolong this. I hope we can all avoid that. If we can all move off this issue and stop responding to the trolls I would really appreciate it. cgf -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/