Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 13:27:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: Jim Drash cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: redistribution cygwin1.dll In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jim Drash wrote: > No I am not thinking trademark. Copyright law is based upon contract law. > So there is legal "detriment" on both sides. Failure to enforce > provisions of a contact can make that contract voidible . > > I am very tied of this debate. The simple thing is to follow the details > of the GPL (or whatever licenses applies) regardless of how "silly" > anyone thinks it is. > > It is just so trivial for developers to comply and debates as to why one > should not have to comply merely waste everyone's time and seem to make > cgf more mean > > Jim Drash Ok, that does it! I finally figured out the *real* purpose of all these GPL discussions. See . So there! ;-) Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/