Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Nomen Nescio <nobody AT dizum DOT com>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
	It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
	Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
	remailer administrator at <abuse AT dizum DOT com>.
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: uname -p reports 'unknown' for Athlons?
Message-ID: <d58f576dda4fff46051fbe61acfd46ac@dizum.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:30:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by outpost.zedz.net (amavis-20020300)

  > >>  Who's the sh-utils guru here?  :-)
  cgf> That could be you!  It's free software, remember?

Cute, very cute, Chris, and yes, we know full well that this
is a (mostly) all-volunteer effort as far as fixing nits,
but that was a very non-responsive and unproductive reply,
and it would be more helpful if you could tell us who deals
with bumping versions in code inherited from gnu.org.
(I.E., sh-utils in general and uname in particular.)

At least, can any of you -RCM's tell us who's the most familiar
with configuration-management issues in that part of the tree?


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/