Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:46:50 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved! Message-ID: <20030511014650.GB18993@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3EBC8ED0 DOT 4040906 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030510072239 DOT GA19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1052554219 DOT 1824 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <20030510082949 DOT GD19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3EBD3179 DOT 6070004 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030510171629 DOT GB11448 AT redhat DOT com> <3EBD3896 DOT 8000202 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1052612200 DOT 897 DOT 31 DOT camel AT localhost> <20030511012322 DOT GA18836 AT redhat DOT com> <1052617309 DOT 897 DOT 43 DOT camel AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1052617309.897.43.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 11:41:49AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 11:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Or we can just use Global atoms, as I suggested in cygwin-developers. > >IIRC Global atoms are not global these days - they are global within a >single login at a time. I can't comment further without looking into the >ftok spec again, which I don't have time for right now... If that is really true, that would defeat the purpose of a global atom. I'm not sure what ftok has to do with whether global atoms are global or not, however. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/