Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 21:44:03 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Idiot spammer Re: The Site Message-ID: <20030511014403.GA18993@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030511001438 DOT GA17951 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 09:34:53PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >I remember looking up one of the spammers' IPs on SpamCop, and it stated >that the address was not marked as spamming due to a lack of reports. >Reporting it required registration, however. I wonder if someone on this >list is registered with them and whether they could report the spams that >get through the filters -- AFAIU, the reported addresses get blocked >fairly aggressively. I was more thinking of reporting them to the ISP. Unfortunately, as I mentioned, we had at least one person on the list who seemed to like to report sources.redhat.com as a spammer to SpamCop, causing me problems on at least three occasions. However, we do use SpamCop for blocking so if someone can *carefully* report this kind of thing it would be a help. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/