Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 19:51:16 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved! Message-ID: <20030510175116.GS19367@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3EBB22F5 DOT 4000801 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1052541657 DOT 1675 DOT 5 DOT camel AT localhost> <3EBC8ED0 DOT 4040906 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030510072239 DOT GA19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1052554219 DOT 1824 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <20030510082949 DOT GD19367 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3EBD3179 DOT 6070004 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030510171629 DOT GB11448 AT redhat DOT com> <3EBD3896 DOT 8000202 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030510174455 DOT GB12325 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030510174455.GB12325@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 01:44:55PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I assume that, in most cases, the high order byte is probably > zero but I don't know for sure. It's not 0. I recall examining the inode number on NTFS years ago and the high word used different non-0 values, strangly not very much of them. It looked like a pattern which I just didn't understand. That was on NT4, AFAIR. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/