Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved! From: Robert Collins To: Charles Wilson Cc: Jason Tishler , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3EBB22F5.4000801@ece.gatech.edu> References: <20030506174725 DOT GE1652 AT tishler DOT net> <3EB84F52 DOT 3020608 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030507133326 DOT GA1824 AT tishler DOT net> <3EB9A54B DOT 8060500 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030508135217 DOT GD512 AT tishler DOT net> <3EBB22F5 DOT 4000801 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-heEX9SYghs9vFvXPOWac" Organization: Message-Id: <1052541657.1675.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 10 May 2003 14:40:57 +1000 --=-heEX9SYghs9vFvXPOWac Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 13:39, Charles Wilson wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: >=20 > > Chuck, > >=20 > > On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 08:31:07PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >=20 > >>I think this needs to be a runtime function, not a compiletime macro. > >=20 > >=20 > > Given Igor's validation, improvements, and corrections of/to my patch, > > do you still want a runtime function approach? Or, is the (ugly and > > possibly performance affecting) macro approach OK? >=20 > Nope -- I'm an idiot. You and Igor are correct. But I'm more concerned=20 > about the other issues I raised, to which nobody has yet responded=20 > (although I'm still working thru the mail). To whit: 64 bit key_t and=20 > coordination with cygwin dll/newlib. Well, theres the API break coming up with cygwin1.dll - do it in sync with that, IMO. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-heEX9SYghs9vFvXPOWac Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+vILZI5+kQ8LJcoIRAk51AJ46I9FuYfRhf6k8+2u6AISXiCs4ugCg1SMd a33NDzsnDw5LHKx/COYypHw= =cl+u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-heEX9SYghs9vFvXPOWac--