Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Matthew O. Persico" To: , Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 19:39:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3EB96C20.8070801@hekimian.com> Message-ID: <200357193934.023448@mopxp> Subject: Re: Fixed Size Setup App = Stupid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h47Ne1P15317 On Wed, 07 May 2003 16:27:12 -0400, Joe Buehler wrote: >Randall R Schulz wrote: > >>And if you look back over the history of repeated posts on exactly >>this >>request / suggestion, it is far from a matter of res-hacking or >>simply >>enabling resizability or the maximize box. Overall size changes >>must be >>propagated to all the individual UI elements, including the control >> >>placements and the column widths in the table display. >> >>Perhaps you're spoiled by Java's layout managers that handle this >>for >>many common cases. As I understand it, the Win32 GUI API and >>toolkits >>don't have a counterpart and GUI writers have to handle all the >>size / >>layout change propagation and it can get pretty tedious. > >I took the advice of whoever it was and used ResHack. It took me >about >an hour (I had to figure out what upx was first). The results are >not perfect, no, but now I have a nice large selection dialog until >such >time as the official version is ready. have you contributed your work back to the project? -- Matthew O. Persico -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/