Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3EB97DD2.2030406@kleckner.net> Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 14:42:42 -0700 From: Jim Kleckner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Melekhov CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rsync over ssh performance problem in cygwin References: <3EB7AA97 DOT 1010901 AT belkam DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This sounds a lot like this topic described here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-12/msg00690.html My recollection is that rsync 2.5.6 didn't get the cygwin patches for buffering applied, sigh. Look here: http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/#dirlist for the code base and here: http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/patches/craigb-perf.diff?rev=1.1 for the buffering patches. Since this file: http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/fileio.c still appears unpatched, this suggests that the performance patches for cygwin still have not been applied to the code base. If you want to try out the version that I use with the buffering patches, you can get it here: http://www.kleckner.net/rsync.tgz I'll leave it there for a month or so. Good luck - Jim Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > Hello! > > We have strange problem with rsync performance. > > We do files syncronization from w2k (cygwin, rsync 2.5.6) over ssh to > Linux (rsync 2.5.5). > > We have several 10Mb files. > First time, when directory on Linux is empty, all looks OK- > syncronization takes about 10 minites. > But when we try to do this second time, i.e. with files on Linux and > windows, synconization takes more than 10 > minites for _file_ ! > And, ssh process on windows eats about 90% of cpu > Any ideas? > > btw, certanly, linux-linux works ok in the same situation. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/